Topic summary
57% 13 analyzed articles/videos 15,311 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neuroscience results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Authority , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.9% saturation with 4,465 hits . Analysis detected 46,120 faulty-reasoning hits from 56,459 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 12% (13,835 of 15,559 topics). This Neuroscience is better (less manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group. Neuroscience
Topic details
Total words: 56,459
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
11% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.1% percentile 1.6% BS Score13 analyzed articles56.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3% Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst