Can stress age your stem cells? New mice study points to gut-brain-bone marrow link 33%

By Corrie Pelc0%

7/2/2026, 4:01:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.4% saturation with 237 hits. Analysis detected 2,348 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,219 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 41.3% and a BS Rank of 33% (14,792 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the article peer group.

Our understanding of the gut-brain axis has evolved and expanded to include the gut microbiome, immune system, and endocrine system. 
The gut-brain connection can be negatively impacted by mental health conditions like psychological stress. 
A new study finds a connection among gut, brain, and bone marrow. 
In this interconnection, psychological stress may alter the gut microbiome, potentially accelerating the aging process in bone marrow stem cells, as shown in a mouse model. 
Psychological stress as a risk factor for diseases 
For this study, researchers used an animal model of psychological stress to examine how it might interact with the brain, intestines, and bone marrow. 
“Many people have experienced becoming more susceptible to colds or other illnesses during periods of prolonged psychological stress,” Meng Zhao, PhD, professor and doctoral supervisor in the Zhongshan School of Medicine at Sun Yat-sen University in China, and senior author of this study, told Medical News Today. 
“This common experience led us to ask whether psychological stress suppresses immunity by affecting hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), which generate the entire blood and immune system,” he said. 
“Psychological stress is increasingly recognized as an important risk factor for many diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and age-related disorders. 
However, we still know relatively little about how emotional stress is translated into biological signals that affect distant organs.” 
 Meng Zhao, PhD 
Stress impairs bone marrow stem cell production 
At the study’s conclusion, Zhao said he and his team found that stress impaired HSC self-renewal and reduced the production of lymphocytes, a type of white blood cell. 
While investigating the underlying mechanism, they unexpectedly discovered that the brain communicates with the bone marrow through sympathetic regulation of the intestinal environment and gut microbiota, ultimately altering microbiota-derived spermidine  naturally occurring organic molecules believed to promote healthy aging  and HSC function. 
“When the brain experiences psychological stress, it sends signals through the sympathetic nervous system to the intestine,” Zhao detailed. 
“These signals alter the intestinal environment and the gut microbiota, reducing the availability of beneficial metabolites such as spermidine. 
Without sufficient spermidine, HSC gradually lose their ability to maintain healthy blood and immune cell production.” 
“In other words, emotional stress in the brain can indirectly influence the body’s immune system through the gut. 
Because spermidine is a metabolite with broad biological functions, this mechanism may also influence other organs beyond the bone marrow.” 
 Meng Zhao, PhD 
Next goal: Confirming gut-brain-bone marrow access in humans 
Scientists also discovered that chronic stress reduced activity in two brain areas  the medial prefrontal cortex and the periaqueductal gray. 
“To our knowledge, this is the first direct functional evidence that specific brain regions regulate HSC function in the bone marrow,” Zhao said. 
“We found that suppressing these two stress-responsive brain regions was sufficient to reproduce many of the hematopoietic and immune defects caused by psychological stress.” 
“These findings demonstrate that specific neural circuits actively regulate immune stem cell function rather than simply responding to stress. 
More importantly, identifying these brain regions provides potential targets for developing new strategies to preserve immune function under chronic psychological stress.” 
 Meng Zhao, PhD 
**“Our next goal is to determine whether this brain–gut–bone marrow axis operates similarly in humans and whether it contributes to immune dysfunction in aging, cancer, and other chronic diseases,” Zhao added. 
** 
Connecting the brain and gut microbiome to other systems 
*MNT* spoke with Ashkan Farhadi, MD, a board certified gastroenterologist at MemorialCare Orange Coast Medical Center in Fountain Valley, CA, about this study, who commented it adds one more layer to our understanding about the role of stress and the whole body. 
“We had some understanding regarding the brain-gut axis that we knew there is a strong bi-directional current connection between the brain and gut,” Farhadi, who was not involved in this study, explained. 
“This access has been recently extended into brain-gut microbiome access. 
And now we’re having this access extended into other organs, including bone marrow and the general health of the body.” 
**“So this study is very novel in a sense that it shows that stress can start working its way through the body by going through the gut and its microbiome,” he added. 
** 
*MNT* also spoke with Dung Trinh, MD, an internist for MemorialCare Medical Group and chief medical officer of the Healthy Brain Clinic in Irvine, CA, who agreed. 
“This is a fascinating and important study because it connects several systems we often talk about separately: the brain, the gut microbiome, the immune system, and aging,” Trinh, who likewise was not involved in this study, said. 
“What stood out to me is that the researchers did not just say ‘stress is bad for the body’; they mapped a plausible biological pathway in mice showing how psychological stress may alter specific brain regions, change gut bacteria, reduce a protective metabolite called spermidine, and contribute to aging-like dysfunction in blood-forming stem cells.” 
 Dung Trinh, MD 
**“That makes the study especially compelling, though it is important to emphasize that this is still preclinical research in animals, not proof that the same mechanism works the same way in humans,” Trinh added. 
** 
5 tips for managing and reducing stress 
For readers who may be looking for ways to lower their stress, *MNT* asked Rosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE, chief of the Division of Gastroenterology at Hackensack University Medical Center, medical director of The Pancreas Center at Hackensack University Medical Center, and associate professor of medicine at Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine in New Jersey, for his top tips. 
Ligresti said one of the most powerful and simple tools you have for combating stress is your own breath. 
He suggested trying this simple deep breathing exercise, which can be done anywhere, at any time, to help calm your nervous system: 
* Step 1: Find a comfortable position, either sitting or standing. 
* Step 2: Inhale slowly and deeply through your nose for a count of four, allowing your belly to expand. 
* Step 3: Hold your breath for a brief moment. 
* Step 4: Exhale slowly through your mouth for a count of five, thinking the word “relax” as you do. 
* Step 5: Repeat this cycle 5 to 10 times, focusing on the sensation of your breath. 
“Another effective way to quickly reduce stress is to get moving,” Ligresti said. 
“You don’t need an intense workout; even a simple, 20-minute walk can work wonders for clearing your mind and reducing feelings of stress.” 
He explained that physical activity helps release endorphins and other natural mood elevators. 
“It also reduces the levels of stress hormones in your body. 
The next time you feel overwhelmed, try stepping outside for a brisk walk. 
You may be surprised at how much calmer and more focused you feel afterward,” he said. 
Trinh also offered some stress-reducing tips, including prioritizing sleep and limiting stress accelerators like alcohol, caffeine, and even constant news or social media exposure, which he said can intensify stress responses. 
“Loneliness and isolation can worsen stress,” Trinh continued. 
“Regular contact with friends, family, faith groups, support groups, or community activities can be protective.” 
“Persistent anxiety, depression, trauma symptoms, caregiver strain, or feeling overwhelmed are good reasons to talk with a primary care clinician or mental health professional,” he added. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.0%Corrie Pelc: 5.1%Medical News Today: 2.8%Confirmation Bias6.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 1.0%Medical News Today: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Corrie Pelc: 2.0%Medical News Today: 1.8%Availability Heuristic3.9%This article: 2.3%Corrie Pelc: 0.4%Medical News Today: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic2.3%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.2%Medical News Today: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 17.8%Corrie Pelc: 3.7%Medical News Today: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias17.8%This article: 8.0%Corrie Pelc: 3.3%Medical News Today: 2.5%Framing Effect8.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.6%Corrie Pelc: 0.3%Medical News Today: 0.6%Status Quo Bias0.6%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 19.4%Corrie Pelc: 7.4%Medical News Today: 6.4%Optimism Bias19.4%This article: 7.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.8%Medical News Today: 0.4%Pessimism Bias7.0%This article: 10.4%Corrie Pelc: 1.1%Medical News Today: 2.0%Negativity Bias10.4%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.2%Medical News Today: 0.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Corrie Pelc: 0.2%Medical News Today: 0.0%In-Group Bias2.2%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 8.8%Corrie Pelc: 2.2%Medical News Today: 1.3%Halo Effect8.8%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.3%Corrie Pelc: 1.4%Medical News Today: 1.2%Recency Bias5.3%This article: 0.7%Corrie Pelc: 0.4%Medical News Today: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.7%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.1%Medical News Today: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.8%Corrie Pelc: 4.7%Medical News Today: 4.8%Appeal to Authority14.8%This article: 2.1%Corrie Pelc: 0.4%Medical News Today: 0.9%False Dilemma2.1%This article: 2.6%Corrie Pelc: 0.5%Medical News Today: 0.3%Slippery Slope2.6%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.8%Corrie Pelc: 6.3%Medical News Today: 3.6%Hasty Generalization11.8%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 1.0%Medical News Today: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 4.8%Corrie Pelc: 1.5%Medical News Today: 1.3%Appeal to Emotion4.8%This article: 3.3%Corrie Pelc: 0.4%Medical News Today: 0.6%Begging the Question3.3%This article: 14.6%Corrie Pelc: 6.7%Medical News Today: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.6%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.8%Corrie Pelc: 1.7%Medical News Today: 0.7%Burden of Proof2.8%This article: 5.9%Corrie Pelc: 1.6%Medical News Today: 0.5%Appeal to Nature5.9%This article: 3.3%Corrie Pelc: 1.1%Medical News Today: 0.4%Composition/Division3.3%This article: 8.6%Corrie Pelc: 1.5%Medical News Today: 0.8%Anecdotal8.6%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.3%Corrie Pelc: 1.0%Medical News Today: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.3%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.9%Corrie Pelc: 0.4%Medical News Today: 0.4%Unattributed Quote3.9%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.6%Corrie Pelc: 0.8%Medical News Today: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice1.6%This article: 18.1%Corrie Pelc: 3.3%Medical News Today: 2.8%Indoctrination18.1%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Corrie Pelc: 0.3%Medical News Today: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1219 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers82%attributed speech217writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 47 words • 100.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 28 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 16 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 18 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 20 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 19 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 21 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 4 words • 0.0% coverageMeng Zhao, PhD • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageAshkan Farhadi, MD • 42 words • 0.0% coverageAshkan Farhadi, MD • 32 words • 0.0% coverageAshkan Farhadi, MD • 10 words • 0.0% coverageAshkan Farhadi, MD • 20 words • 0.0% coverageAshkan Farhadi, MD • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 27 words • 0.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 37 words • 0.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 54 words • 0.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 4 words • 0.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 58 words • 0.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 19 words • 0.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 22 words • 100.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 11 words • 100.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 20 words • 100.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 10 words • 100.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 20 words • 100.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 17 words • 100.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 13 words • 100.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 23 words • 100.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 13 words • 0.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 11 words • 0.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 13 words • 100.0% coverageRosario Ligresti, MD, FASGE • 16 words • 0.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 31 words • 100.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 15 words • 100.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 26 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Dung Trinh, MD

98%flagged-word coverage
236 attributed words24% of attributed speech88% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Indoctrination+30.5 ptsWriter: 0.0%Dung Trinh, MD: 30.5%30.5%Biased Writer Voice-9.2 ptsWriter: 9.2%Dung Trinh, MD: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.