Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,219 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gut Microbiome results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 404 hits. Analysis detected 3,368 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,876 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠34% (10,979 of 16,562 topics). This Gut Microbiome is better (less manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Gut Microbiome
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,876
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510033.7% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.1%3.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.3%, sitewide 3.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos