Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gut Microbiome results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,316 hits . Analysis detected 9,268 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,996 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 32% (25,419 of 37,178 keywords). This Gut Microbiome is better (less manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group. Gut Microbiome
Keyword details
Total words: 11,996
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.6% percentile 2.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles12K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 4.6% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst