4 simple blood tests may spot signs of dementia earlier than other tests 41%

By Amy McLean0%

7/4/2026, 8:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 35.3% saturation with 361 hits. Analysis detected 1,611 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,024 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 45.7% and a BS Rank of 41% (12,542 of 21,172 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the article peer group.

Medical News Today has collated its recent coverage around blood tests for detecting dementia early, which could aid diagnosis years before symptoms appear. 
One study suggests that a blood test could help predict the risk of dementia in older women up to 25 years before the onset of symptoms. 
Another study finds that a blood test that monitors changes in the gut microbiome may help diagnose dementia earlier. 
The other two studies measure blood levels of phosphorylated tau 217 (pTau217), a biomarker of dementia, as well as tau and beta-amyloid. 
Around 74% of Americans with Alzheimer’s disease, a type of dementia, are ages 75 years or older, according to the Alzheimer’s Association. 
The condition can also develop in people under 65 years of age. 
This is known as younger-onset or early onset dementia. 
Being able to detect signs of dementia as early as possible and screen for the possible risk may help to improve treatment outcomes or slow down the progression of the disease. 
Medical News Today looks at its coverage of 4 recent studies on detecting Alzheimer’s disease early via means other than brain scans  one blood test based on changes in the gut microbiome, and another three based on the proteins tau and beta-amyloid and their variants. 
Protein biomarkers may indicate quicker cognitive decline 
A study published in The Lancet in May 2026 examined the feasibility of blood-based biomarker tests to detect early signs of cognitive decline in adults between the ages of 53 and 69 without a dementia diagnosis. 
The study researchers focused on data from around 1,300 participants of the U.S. 
Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. 
Among the participants, around 6% had high blood levels of proteins tau and beta-amyloid. 
Five years later, the same individuals experienced greater cognitive decline compared with those who did not have high levels of beta-amyloid and tau. 
In a previous interview with Medical News Today, Megan Glenn, PsyD, clinical neuropsychologist in the Center for Memory and Healthy Aging at the Hackensack Meridian Neuroscience Institute at Jersey Shore University Medical Center in New Jersey, who was not involved in this study, said: 
“We have known for a long time that subtle cognitive changes and biological markers, particularly amyloid accumulation, begin developing decades before a patient meets the criteria for a formal dementia diagnosis.” 
“We have been searching for accessible ways to detect these earliest signs during this ‘preclinical’ phase so we can intervene sooner, and this study represents a major step toward making early detection scalable and accessible to the general public,” she said. 
Blood test may predict dementia in women up to 25 years before symptoms 
A cohort study of 2,766 older women, published in JAMA Network Open in March 2026, found that the protein plasma phosphorylated tau 217 (pTau217) may help predict signs of dementia up to 25 years before symptoms appear. 
At the start of the study, participants had no memory or cognitive problems. 
Ranging from 1 to 25 years later, those who had higher levels of pTau217  of which there were 1,311 participants  had experienced mild cognitive decline or dementia. 
The study noted some association between higher pTau217 levels, dementia, and factors such as age and genetics. 
For example, those carrying the APOE ε4 gene and individuals older than 70 years experienced a more significant cognitive decline. 
While such biomarkers may help predict dementia years before symptoms appear, further research is necessary. 
Discussing the blood tests in a previous interview with MNT, lead study author Hyun-Sik Yang explained: 
“There are already 2 FDA-approved pTau217 blood tests in clinical use. 
As more data accumulate, blood tests  especially pTau217  appear to be as good as, or even better than, cerebrospinal fluid testing and show excellent concordance with amyloid-β PET.” 
Biomarker changes may detect cognitive decline before brain scans 
In a study published in Nature Communications in April 2026, researchers found that the pTau217 biomarker may help detect signs of cognitive decline earlier than tests such as PET scans can. 
Brain scans are traditionally used to help diagnose dementia. 
For an average of 8 years, the study followed 317 adults ages between 50 and 90 years who did not have any thinking or memory problems at the start of the study. 
Those with higher levels of pTau217 at the start of the study experienced faster cognitive decline. 
The study noted that higher pTau217 levels were linked with a greater accumulation of the amyloid-beta protein, the buildup of which experts believe may be the main cause of Alzheimer’s disease. 
The gut-brain link may indicate early cognitive impairment 
Researchers from the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom studied the relationship between Alzheimer’s disease and microbe-derived metabolites (MDMs), waste products produced by gut bacteria, publishing their results in Gut Microbes. 
The study involved analyzing blood and stool samples of 15 adults ages 50 years and older. 
Some participants had no signs of cognitive impairment, while others had mild cognitive impairment or subjective (self-reported) cognitive impairment. 
The researchers used machine learning to examine the 33 metabolites they identified in the samples. 
They found lower levels of key neuroprotective metabolites, which support brain health, in people with mild or subjective cognitive impairment. 
The same individuals also had elevated levels of a cytotoxic metabolite, indoxyl sulfate, suggesting that lower levels of neuroprotective metabolites or higher levels of cytotoxic metabolites may indicate cognitive decline. 
In a previous interview with MNT, Dung Trinh, MD, an internist with MemorialCare Medical Group and the chief medical officer of the Healthy Brain Clinic in Irvine, CA, who was not involved in the study, spoke about these findings. 
“[The study] suggests that a small panel of blood metabolites linked to diet and the gut microbiome may help identify people with very early cognitive changes, which is exciting because we need less invasive ways to detect risk sooner,” he said. 
“At the same time, this was a relatively small, cross-sectional study, so it shows association rather than proving that these markers can reliably predict who will go on to develop dementia,” he added. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 1.6%Medical News Today: 2.8%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.4%Medical News Today: 1.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Amy McLean: 2.4%Medical News Today: 1.8%Availability Heuristic4.9%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.4%Medical News Today: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%Amy McLean: 2.0%Medical News Today: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias4.9%This article: 1.3%Amy McLean: 2.9%Medical News Today: 2.5%Framing Effect1.3%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.0%Amy McLean: 1.0%Medical News Today: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 27.3%Amy McLean: 9.5%Medical News Today: 6.4%Optimism Bias27.3%This article: 4.7%Amy McLean: 0.6%Medical News Today: 0.4%Pessimism Bias4.7%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 1.6%Medical News Today: 2.0%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.8%Medical News Today: 0.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.1%Medical News Today: 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 4.3%Amy McLean: 0.6%Medical News Today: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias4.3%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Amy McLean: 0.9%Medical News Today: 1.3%Halo Effect3.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 1.5%Amy McLean: 0.1%Medical News Today: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect1.5%This article: 9.7%Amy McLean: 2.4%Medical News Today: 1.2%Recency Bias9.7%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.5%Medical News Today: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Straw Man0.0%This article: 35.3%Amy McLean: 9.1%Medical News Today: 4.8%Appeal to Authority35.3%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.9%Medical News Today: 0.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.1%Medical News Today: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.9%Amy McLean: 3.7%Medical News Today: 3.6%Hasty Generalization4.9%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 1.3%Amy McLean: 0.2%Medical News Today: 0.3%Bandwagon1.3%This article: 8.0%Amy McLean: 1.2%Medical News Today: 1.3%Appeal to Emotion8.0%This article: 3.0%Amy McLean: 0.2%Medical News Today: 0.6%Begging the Question3.0%This article: 15.3%Amy McLean: 5.0%Medical News Today: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)15.3%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.6%Medical News Today: 0.5%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.0%Amy McLean: 2.4%Medical News Today: 0.8%Anecdotal4.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 2.9%Amy McLean: 0.9%Medical News Today: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.9%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.2%Medical News Today: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 1.1%Amy McLean: 0.2%Medical News Today: 0.4%Unattributed Quote1.1%This article: 8.1%Amy McLean: 1.8%Medical News Today: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection8.1%This article: 10.0%Amy McLean: 2.2%Medical News Today: 1.6%Biased Writer Voice10.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 1.0%Medical News Today: 2.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.0%Medical News Today: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Amy McLean: 0.8%Medical News Today: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1024 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers30%attributed speech716writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageAlzheimer’s Association • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 46 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Glenn, PsyD • 44 words • 0.0% coverageMegan Glenn, PsyD • 31 words • 100.0% coverageMegan Glenn, PsyD • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageHyun-Sik Yang • 16 words • 0.0% coverageHyun-Sik Yang • 11 words • 100.0% coverageHyun-Sik Yang • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 39 words • 0.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 41 words • 100.0% coverageDung Trinh, MD • 33 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hyun-Sik Yang

100%flagged-word coverage
57 attributed words19% of attributed speech73% writer coverage
0%27.5%55.0%Biased Writer Voice+48.3 ptsWriter: 4.3%Hyun-Sik Yang: 52.6%52.6%Unattributed Quote+19.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hyun-Sik Yang: 19.3%19.3%Quote-first Misdirection+19.3 ptsWriter: 0.0%Hyun-Sik Yang: 19.3%19.3%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.