Topic summary
23% 15 analyzed articles/videos 10,773 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alzheimer's Disease results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Appeal to Emotion , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 4,397 hits . Analysis detected 34,769 faulty-reasoning hits from 57,766 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.2% and a BS Rank of 3% (15,091 of 15,414 topics). This Alzheimer's Disease is better (less manipulative) than 97.90% of the peer group. Alzheimer's Disease
Topic details
Total words: 57,766
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 2.1% percentile 1.2% BS Score15 analyzed articles57.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst