Author summary
64% 1 analyzed article/video 1,033 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alcynna Lloyd results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Appeal to Emotion , with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 228 hits . Analysis detected 2,225 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,099 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 37% (4,043 of 6,362 authors). This Alcynna Lloyd is better (less manipulative) than 63.50% of the peer group. Alcynna Lloyd
Author details
Total words: 3,099
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
37% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 36.5% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.6% 3.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Author 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 7.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.3% Status Quo Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.2% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 0.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst