Fox News89%

Alzheimer's stole pieces of our lives. A new treatment is giving us a fighting chance 62%

7/15/2026, 1:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Optimism Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 28.3% saturation with 255 hits. Analysis detected 2,392 faulty-reasoning hits from 902 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 57% and a BS Rank of 62% (8,517 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 61.10% of the article peer group.

Millions of Americans are rightfully terrified of Alzheimer’s disease. 
They have witnessed its devastating impact on their families and friends. 
But we, five patients from different corners of the country, offer our stories to bring hope to others. 
We reclaimed our lives from this devastating disease by getting diagnosed early enough to benefit from new anti-amyloid treatments . 
Our lives show these new treatments can slow progression and add meaningful time. 
Like millions of Americans, we followed expert guidelines to reduce the risk of cognitive decline: exercising regularly, following healthy diets , staying mentally and socially active, and building lives around serving our families and communities. 
I WAS A DOCTOR CARING FOR ALZHEIMER’S PATIENTS. 
AT 57, I BECAME ONE. 
HERE’S WHAT’S NEXT 
And still, Alzheimer’s came for us. 
Disease prevention is a critical piece of the fight against Alzheimer’s . 
And yet, lifestyle measures alone did not prevent our decline. 
Each of us was diagnosed early enough for one of the new anti-amyloid treatments to become an option. 
These treatments work best when initiated early. 
We knew they were not cures, but rather an opportunity to slow the disease enough to preserve the moments, independence and relationships that make life meaningful. 
NEWT GINGRICH: ALZHEIMER’S IS WAGING A WAR ON MILLIONS. 
CONGRESS COULD HELP US WIN IT 
For us, treatment has been a lifeline. 
I, Brent Beasley , am a retired internal medicine physician. 
When I was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s, it helped explain the lapses that led my employer to terminate me before anyone understood what was happening in my brain. 
With treatment, I went from losing control of my daily routine to once again serving as a deacon at my church, working as an advocate for patients with the disease, and teaching medical students about compassionate bedside care. 
I, Lori Baetz , a retired engineering technician, went from experiencing terrifying episodes of getting lost in my own neighborhood to returning to my daily walks and routines with confidence and independence. 
THE BEST TIME TO TALK TO YOUR PARENTS ABOUT SENIOR CARE  BEFORE IT'S TOO LATE 
I, Ralph Carmona , a retired community and corporate sector advocate , have run five marathons since my 2015 diagnosis and treatment in a clinical trial . 
I am now able to serve on advisory boards, engage in public outreach for Alzheimer’s research and financial support, and continue running marathons. 
I often tell people that I went from not making my high school track team to qualifying for the Boston Marathon years after my diagnosis. 
I, Kathi Rigby , am a mother, grandmother and advocate. 
Treatment improved my memory and mental sharpness, giving me more time to make memories with my husband, six children, 22 grandchildren and two great-grandchildren. 
It has also allowed me to continue serving my community and advocating for other patients to inspire hope rather than surrender to the disease. 
I, Michael B., am a prolific lifelong entrepreneur. 
I have never let my brain idle and have exercised daily since I was 15. 
And yet, three years ago, my family and I noticed I was in a downward cognitive spiral, and I was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease . 
Treatment has given me my life back. 
Now 85, I am physically and mentally strong. 
Every day, I complete a 1.5-mile walk, 25 pushups and 35 sit-ups. 
I drive independently, frequent the gym, and pour energy into my loved ones. 
We are not alone. 
Each of us knows more people who have benefited from early diagnosis and treatment. 
HIDDEN BRAIN CONDITION MAY QUADRUPLE DEMENTIA RISK IN OLDER ADULTS, STUDY SUGGESTS 
Alzheimer’s remains a devastating disease that requires more research to improve our understanding of why these medicines slow progression, how they can be improved, and what other breakthroughs may still lie ahead. 
But early diagnosis is a gift. 
It gave us the chance to pursue lifestyle interventions, plan for the future, participate in clinical research, and benefit from treatment before irreversible cognitive decline occured. 
We want that chance for others. 
To change the trajectory of Alzheimer’s disease for future generations, early diagnosis must become a national priority . 
Patients deserve the chance to learn what is happening while they still have time to act. 
CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION 
That means expanding access to blood tests that can help identify Alzheimer’s disease earlier and more accurately. 
It means empowering primary care doctors  the clinicians many Americans see most frequently  to recognize cognitive impairment sooner and guide families through treatment and lifestyle options. 
It means supporting caregivers so patients can remain at home, engaged and independent for as long as possible. 
A brighter future would also require ensuring that patients who are good candidates for these treatments can pursue them without burdensome Medicare administrative policies and private insurance denials that block access. 
Better tools to fight Alzheimer’s disease are finally here. 
We ask that current and future patients have the opportunity to use them. 
Lori Baetz is a retired engineering technician in Haslett, Michigan. 
Kathi Rigby is an Alzheimer’s advocate and patient living in Anaheim, California., and Summerfield, Florida. 
Ralph Carmona is a retired community and corporate sector advocate in Portland, Maine. 
Michael B. is a retired entrepreneur in Overland Park, Kansas. 
Dr. 
Beasley and Mr. 
Carmona appear in the new podcast series Ahead of Alzheimer’s . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 15.5%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias15.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 6.9%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic6.9%This article: 5.3%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic5.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 6.5%Fox Nation: 3.0%Overconfidence Bias6.5%This article: 16.2%Fox Nation: 11.9%Framing Effect16.2%This article: 12.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion12.9%This article: 3.1%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 21.8%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias21.8%This article: 4.9%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias4.9%This article: 7.6%Fox Nation: 10.8%Negativity Bias7.6%This article: 11.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias11.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 11.8%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect11.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.0%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority13.0%This article: 4.7%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma4.7%This article: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.7%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 5.1%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization5.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.7%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon2.7%This article: 28.0%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion28.0%This article: 2.9%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question2.9%This article: 28.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)28.3%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 5.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof5.4%This article: 1.7%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature1.7%This article: 1.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division1.3%This article: 24.8%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal24.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.4%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection1.0%This article: 0.9%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.9%This article: 4.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination4.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.8%

902 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers42%attributed speech519writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageBrent Beasley • 10 words • 0.0% coverageBrent Beasley • 27 words • 0.0% coverageBrent Beasley • 38 words • 0.0% coverageLori Baetz • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageRalph Carmona • 27 words • 0.0% coverageRalph Carmona • 23 words • 0.0% coverageRalph Carmona • 25 words • 0.0% coverageKathi Rigby • 10 words • 0.0% coverageKathi Rigby • 24 words • 0.0% coverageKathi Rigby • 24 words • 0.0% coverageMichael B. • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMichael B. • 15 words • 0.0% coverageMichael B. • 25 words • 0.0% coverageMichael B. • 7 words • 0.0% coverageMichael B. • 8 words • 0.0% coverageMichael B. • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMichael B. • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageFOX News • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageLori Baetz • 10 words • 0.0% coverageKathi Rigby • 15 words • 0.0% coverageRalph Carmona • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMichael B. • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lori Baetz

76%flagged-word coverage
42 attributed words11% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Indoctrination-7.9 ptsWriter: 7.9%Lori Baetz: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Lori Baetz: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-1.5 ptsWriter: 1.5%Lori Baetz: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.