Topic summary
65%2 analyzed articles/videos1,020 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Medical Treatments results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Optimism Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 500 hits. Analysis detected 4,752 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,962 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 59% (6,845 of 16,562 topics). This Medical Treatments is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group.
Medical Treatments
Topic details
Total words: 3,962
Article count: 2
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.7% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.3%3.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.9%5.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.3%4.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.7%11.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 10.6%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos