Topic summary
46% 248 analyzed articles/videos 159,152 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Public Health results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.4% saturation with 68,246 hits . Analysis detected 625,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 810,078 analyzed words across 247 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 6% (14,471 of 15,330 topics). This Public Health is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group. Public Health
Topic details
Total words: 810,078
Article count: 247
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
6% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 5.6% percentile 1.4% BS Score247 analyzed articles810.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.6% 4.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.4% 8.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.9% 4.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst