Author summary
â 55% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,637 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nosmot Gbadamosi results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Authority , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 1,059 hits . Analysis detected 6,832 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,720 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of â 23% (4,773 of 6,199 authors). This Nosmot Gbadamosi is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the peer group. Nosmot Gbadamosi
Author details
Total words: 9,720
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.0% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.4% 0.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.2% 3.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.3%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst