Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,279 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pendarvis Harshaw results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and In-Group Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 1,509 hits . Analysis detected 8,254 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,541 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 32% (4,312 of 6,315 authors). This Pendarvis Harshaw is better (less manipulative) than 68.30% of the peer group. Pendarvis Harshaw
Author details
Total words: 11,541
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 31.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 13.1% 13.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 13.1%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.3%, sitewide 5.3% In-Group Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 6.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst