Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 3,305 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amy McLean results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 1,261 hits . Analysis detected 7,708 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,220 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 20% (5,019 of 6,244 authors). This Amy McLean is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Amy McLean
Author details
Total words: 13,220
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 9.5% 9.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Optimism Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 6.0% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst