Speaker summary
⁠67%1 analyzed article/video60 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hyun-Sik Yang results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 65.7% saturation with 45.639 hits. Analysis detected 234.703 faulty-reasoning hits from 60 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (14,716 of 28,364 speakers). This Hyun-Sik Yang is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Hyun-Sik Yang
Speaker details
Total words: 60
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.1% percentile
30.4% BS Score1 analyzed videos60 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 65.7%65.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 51.9%51.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 30.6%30.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 11.2%11.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 65.7%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Speaker 51.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Speaker 30.6%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 11.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos