Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,873 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Biomarkers results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 1,770 hits. Analysis detected 4,956 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,492 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (10,162 of 16,321 topics). This Biomarkers is better (less manipulative) than 62.30% of the peer group.
Biomarkers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,492
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510037.7% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 23.6%23.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.6%3.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 6.9%6.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 23.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.9%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 0.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos