Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,024 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Early Detection results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 869 hits. Analysis detected 3,007 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,096 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,453 of 15,886 topics). This Early Detection is worse (more manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Early Detection
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,096
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.4% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 21.2%21.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.5%2.5%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 21.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 12.0%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.6%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos