Speaker summary
50% 3 analyzed articles/videos 442 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dung Trinh, MD results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias , Anecdotal , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 23.4% saturation with 165 hits . Analysis detected 1,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 442 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 9.5% and a BS Rank of 11% (25,461 of 28,364 speakers). This Dung Trinh, MD is better (less manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group. Dung Trinh, MD
Speaker details
Total words: 442
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
10% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 10.2% percentile 9.5% BS Score3 analyzed videos442 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 16.7% 16.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 23.4% 23.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 15.9% 15.9% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 13.7% 13.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 11.8% 11.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 15.3% 15.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 23.4%, sitewide 11.1% Negativity Bias: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 16.7%, sitewide 1.9% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Speaker 15.9%, sitewide 5.2% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 13.7%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Speaker 10.2%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 2.7% Burden of Proof: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.4% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Speaker 3.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 5.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst