Author summary
39%2 analyzed articles/videos2,930 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathryn Hulick results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Availability Heuristic, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 721 hits. Analysis detected 8,251 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,252 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 23% (4,783 of 6,170 authors). This Kathryn Hulick is better (less manipulative) than 77.50% of the peer group.
Kathryn Hulick
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
23%Kathryn Hulick (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,252
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

23% percentile
025507510022.5% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.9%0.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.4%6.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.1%3.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.9%4.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Slippery Slope: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos