Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 2,327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Diego Arguedas Ortiz results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Overconfidence Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 15% saturation with 1,400 hits . Analysis detected 8,500 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,308 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 41% (3,929 of 6,629 authors). This Diego Arguedas Ortiz is better (less manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group. Diego Arguedas Ortiz
Author details
Total words: 9,308
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.7% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 15.0% 15.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 8.9% 8.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 15.0%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 4.6% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.9%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Nature: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.2% Indoctrination: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.8% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst