Author summary
46%4 analyzed articles/videos1,555 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Chapados results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 672 hits. Analysis detected 7,315 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,751 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,424 of 6,170 authors). This Andrew Chapados is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Andrew Chapados
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
45%Andrew Chapados (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,751
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.3%7.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 8.4%8.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.9%5.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.1%4.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.3%3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.7%4.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.3%4.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.8%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.7%, sitewide 0.5%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate