Topic summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dietary Trends results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Unattributed Quote, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 468 hits. Analysis detected 4,228 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,971 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (3,156 of 16,562 topics). This Dietary Trends is worse (more manipulative) than 80.90% of the peer group.
Dietary Trends
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,971
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.9% percentile
5.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 17.8%17.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 23.7%23.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 14.5%14.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 16.4%16.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Topic 7.5%7.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 15.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 1.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 7.5%Anecdotal: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Dunning-Kruger Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos