Keyword summary
98% 2 analyzed articles/videos 657 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pig results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Unattributed Quote , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 494 hits . Analysis detected 4,911 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,776 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 76% (9,205 of 37,536 keywords). This Pig is worse (more manipulative) than 75.50% of the peer group. Pig
Keyword details
Total words: 2,776
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
76% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.5% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.1% 8.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.1% 0.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 11.5% 11.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 9.0% 9.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 17.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 3.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 0.4% Indoctrination: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Dunning-Kruger Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst