Keyword summary
52% 6 analyzed articles/videos 8,499 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chicken results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.9% saturation with 3,172 hits . Analysis detected 26,331 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,880 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (30,395 of 35,675 keywords). This Chicken is better (less manipulative) than 85.20% of the peer group. Chicken
Keyword details
Total words: 31,880
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score6 analyzed articles31.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst