Author summary
0% 9 analyzed articles/videos 1,279 analyzed words
BS Summary: These James Ramsay results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16% saturation with 784 hits . Analysis detected 5,943 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,889 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,656 of 6,462 authors). This James Ramsay is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group. James Ramsay
Author details
Total words: 4,889
Article count: 9
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.9% percentile 3.0% BS Score9 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.4% 4.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.0% 16.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.2% 14.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.6% 4.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 9.9%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.8%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst