Gothamist76%

Extra Extra: There's a magician in the NY-12 congressional race 50%

By James Ramsay0%

5/4/2026, 6:30:53 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 7 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 82 faulty-reasoning hits from 160 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of 50% (10,758 of 21,176 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 50.80% of the article peer group.

Good Monday afternoon in New York City, where murders are at a record low. 
Here's what else is happening: 
John Sterling, the legendary Yankees radio broadcaster, has died at the age of 87. 
State Assemblymember Micah Lasher, who's running for the open seat in New York's 12th Congressional District, is also a magician and wrote a book on magic tricks. 
In the race to replace outgoing Rep. 
Nydia Velázquez in New York's 7th Congressional District, former City Council Speaker Corey Johnson donated four figures to two different candidates. 
Will the Philadelphia 76ers actually do anything to stop Knicks fans from buying tickets and filling their arena during this upcoming playoff series? 
Yuppies are under threat. 
An 8-year-old boy in New Jersey was bitten by a beaver while fishing. 
Teens still love the mall. 
And finally, probably pungent: 
He Found a Clam, A CLAM! 
pic.twitter.com/0GjbyCybG3 
 B&S (@_B___S) May 2, 2026 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 2.6%Gothamist: 2.7%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%James Ramsay: 5.8%Gothamist: 3.6%Availability Heuristic8.1%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 1.1%Gothamist: 0.7%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 1.1%Gothamist: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 16.0%Gothamist: 8.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 1.8%Gothamist: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 8.8%James Ramsay: 3.5%Gothamist: 3.6%Optimism Bias8.8%This article: 2.5%James Ramsay: 1.6%Gothamist: 1.7%Pessimism Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 14.2%Gothamist: 8.5%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 2.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 1.8%Gothamist: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 3.0%Gothamist: 0.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 16.9%James Ramsay: 3.8%Gothamist: 2.1%Halo Effect16.9%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.1%Gothamist: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 2.0%Gothamist: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 6.7%Gothamist: 4.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 1.3%Gothamist: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.1%James Ramsay: 9.8%Gothamist: 3.8%Hasty Generalization3.1%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.4%Gothamist: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 4.4%Gothamist: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 2.7%Gothamist: 2.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.3%Gothamist: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 8.1%James Ramsay: 4.4%Gothamist: 2.8%Anecdotal8.1%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 1.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.6%Gothamist: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 1.4%Gothamist: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 3.8%James Ramsay: 4.2%Gothamist: 1.2%Unattributed Quote3.8%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 4.6%Gothamist: 1.0%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 9.9%Gothamist: 3.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.9%Gothamist: 1.5%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.5%Gothamist: 1.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 0.0%Gothamist: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%James Ramsay: 1.4%Gothamist: 1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

160 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.