Topic summary
0% 8 analyzed articles/videos 4,485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nba Playoffs results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Negativity Bias , and Halo Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 21.6% saturation with 4,114 hits . Analysis detected 18,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,085 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 26% (11,217 of 15,145 topics). This Nba Playoffs is better (less manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group. Nba Playoffs
Topic details
Total words: 19,085
Article count: 8
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.9% percentile 2.1% BS Score8 analyzed articles19.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 21.6% 21.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 21.6%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst