Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Jake Nisse results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Recency Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 167 hits . Analysis detected 1,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,220 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,194 authors). This Jake Nisse is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Jake Nisse
Author details
Total words: 2,220
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.5% 7.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.6% 2.6% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 4.6% 4.6% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.5%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Recency Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.8% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst