Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 755 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Broderick Turner results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Optimism Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 202 hits . Analysis detected 1,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,265 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,563 of 6,348 authors). This Broderick Turner is better (less manipulative) than 56.10% of the peer group. Broderick Turner
Author details
Total words: 2,265
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.9% 0.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.3%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 3.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Indoctrination: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5% No True Scotsman: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.1% Primacy Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst