Author summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,064 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geoff Clark results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Recency Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 15.6% saturation with 1,719 hits. Analysis detected 13,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,021 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,856 of 6,135 authors). This Geoff Clark is worse (more manipulative) than 53.50% of the peer group.
Geoff Clark
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
54%Geoff Clark (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,021
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

54% percentile
025507510053.5% percentile
2.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles11K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 15.6%15.6%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 10.0%10.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 10.7%10.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Author 15.6%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Overconfidence Bias: Author 10.7%, sitewide 4.6%Recency Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 2.7%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anchoring Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Author 4.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.1%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate