Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 3,674 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sarah Sloat results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Optimism Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 16.5% saturation with 2,177 hits . Analysis detected 8,816 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,162 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,367 of 6,170 authors). This Sarah Sloat is better (less manipulative) than 70.80% of the peer group. Sarah Sloat
Author details
Total words: 13,162
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
29% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.2% percentile 2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 8.3% 8.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 16.5% 16.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 8.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 16.5%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.1%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst