Author summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,513 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Raphael Rashid results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 543 hits . Analysis detected 5,520 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,809 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 30% (4,642 of 6,602 authors). This Raphael Rashid is better (less manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group. Raphael Rashid
Author details
Total words: 6,809
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
30% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 29.7% percentile 2.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.4% 5.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.9% 6.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 7.1% 7.1% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 7.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 7.1%, sitewide 3.3% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst