Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Carly Nairn results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hindsight Bias , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13.2% saturation with 199 hits . Analysis detected 1,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,506 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This Carly Nairn is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Carly Nairn
Author details
Total words: 1,506
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.7% 1.7% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 4.8% 4.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.6% 5.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 13.2% 13.2% Special Pleading Sitewide 0.3% Author 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.2%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.0% Hindsight Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Indoctrination: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Begging the Question: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Special Pleading: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst