Gross: California Dem governor hopeful Xavier Becerra advises visitors to eat tacos from illegal, unsanitary food carts - Blogs 93%

By Monica Showalter93%

7/20/2026, 9:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 28 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 49.7% saturation with 277 hits. Analysis detected 1,558 faulty-reasoning hits from 557 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 88.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,567 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.80% of the article peer group.

Not too long ago, DSA Democrats in Los Angeles were handing out ' free' taco carts to illegal aliens running sidewalk vending businesses. 
Supposedly, their 280 carts are sanitary, but that's in a sea of unregulated ones that are also out there. 
In any case, I have my doubts that the city-supplied ones are clean after reading about the permit process, which said mere ' priority ' would be given applicants who had primary and supplementary paperwork. 
There's a little wiggle room there. 
It was a slap in the face at the battered, overtaxed, legal, restaurants who are undermined by the illegal vendors who are often at their front doors, often fighting and taking away business. 
Los Angeles City Council member Eunisses Hernandez , who has never missed a meal, was front and center in the effort. 
But that didn't stop Democrat gubernatorial candidate for governor, Xavier Becerra, who came out in favor of eating off these illegal carts: 
If you're in California and want a street taco, I have one piece of advice: 
Look for the little street cart. 
That's where you'll find the real thing. 🌮 pic.twitter.com/KQMryhjSaH 
- Xavier Becerra (@XavierBecerra) July 21, 2026 
Why should anyone be eating off an unregulated, and likely unsanitary. taco or cut-fruit-on-a-stick cart? 
Is Montezuma's revenge Becerra's idea of the authentic, 'real thing' experience? 
For many turistas, it is, but why is Becerra so interested in importing it here? 
Don't legitimate Mexican restaurants in Los Angeles, run by mom-and-pop legal immigrants know how to create 'the real thing' too? 
What an insult to legitimate restaurants which labor under ominous regulations, massive taxes, huge labor costs and illegal competition. 
Seems Becerra is probably returning a favor to the likes of Hernandez and her favored NGOs who operate this questionable program. 
But even with free food carts being handed out, illegal food carts remain pervasive, and lack of basic regulation means anything goes as far as food safety and sanitation practices. 
According to the California Post : 
Locals are furious after the park under the Hollywood Sign allegedly sees fruit vendors defecate and urinate before serving food. 
Exclusive photos obtained by The California Post appear to show unpermitted sellers using the bushes at Lake Hollywood Park before returning to slice and sell products to customers. 
The images were provided by outraged residents who say they have spent years documenting vendors relieving themselves in the park, dumping wastewater into the street and leaving behind piles of trash while city officials have repeatedly failed to stop the growing operation. 
"It's disgusting," longtime resident Cindy Cobb told The Post. 
They, too, are rock-ribbed part of the illegal food cart scene in Los Angeles and San Diego, reportedly controlled by Mexican cartels. 
They are here illegally, they are practicing sanitation seen in their own country, and they are undercutting legal immigrants and native-born Americans who follow the rules. 
Yet here Becerra is, out championing them, as if he's campaigning to win the illegal-immigrant vote. 
Who is he planning to represent in this race? 
Is he taking orders from cartel masters to promote these food carts as ' autentico ' over legitimate Mexican restaurants? 
It seems something fishy is going on. 
Image: Screenshot from X video . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 23.2%Monica Showalter: 20.5%American Thinker: 10.6%Confirmation Bias23.2%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.8%American Thinker: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%Monica Showalter: 6.3%American Thinker: 3.7%Availability Heuristic5.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 1.9%American Thinker: 1.6%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 1.1%American Thinker: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 3.6%American Thinker: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 5.6%Monica Showalter: 7.1%American Thinker: 7.1%Framing Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.9%American Thinker: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.6%Monica Showalter: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 1.1%American Thinker: 1.6%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 13.1%Monica Showalter: 2.6%American Thinker: 2.6%Pessimism Bias13.1%This article: 49.7%Monica Showalter: 21.1%American Thinker: 13.0%Negativity Bias49.7%This article: 2.9%Monica Showalter: 1.6%American Thinker: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias2.9%This article: 9.7%Monica Showalter: 4.8%American Thinker: 2.9%Fundamental Attribution Error9.7%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Monica Showalter: 4.3%American Thinker: 3.9%In-Group Bias8.1%This article: 3.9%Monica Showalter: 5.8%American Thinker: 5.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 4.0%American Thinker: 2.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 1.4%American Thinker: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 1.4%American Thinker: 1.3%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 3.9%Monica Showalter: 0.8%American Thinker: 0.7%Primacy Effect3.9%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Monica Showalter: 7.7%American Thinker: 5.6%Ad Hominem2.7%This article: 3.6%Monica Showalter: 2.3%American Thinker: 4.0%Straw Man3.6%This article: 6.1%Monica Showalter: 4.5%American Thinker: 4.7%Appeal to Authority6.1%This article: 1.6%Monica Showalter: 4.2%American Thinker: 4.7%False Dilemma1.6%This article: 11.3%Monica Showalter: 2.8%American Thinker: 3.3%Slippery Slope11.3%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.1%Monica Showalter: 23.7%American Thinker: 16.8%Hasty Generalization8.1%This article: 3.6%Monica Showalter: 1.3%American Thinker: 0.6%Red Herring3.6%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.8%American Thinker: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.0%Monica Showalter: 9.9%American Thinker: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion5.0%This article: 7.5%Monica Showalter: 4.3%American Thinker: 2.7%Begging the Question7.5%This article: 7.5%Monica Showalter: 5.3%American Thinker: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.5%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 2.5%American Thinker: 1.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.5%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 1.0%American Thinker: 0.8%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 21.9%Monica Showalter: 5.3%American Thinker: 3.6%Anecdotal21.9%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 1.1%American Thinker: 0.4%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 11.0%Monica Showalter: 2.9%American Thinker: 2.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)11.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.3%American Thinker: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 6.3%Monica Showalter: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.2%Personal Incredulity6.3%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 16.0%Monica Showalter: 1.9%American Thinker: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy16.0%This article: 3.6%Monica Showalter: 2.0%American Thinker: 3.1%Unattributed Quote3.6%This article: 1.6%Monica Showalter: 2.5%American Thinker: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection1.6%This article: 33.6%Monica Showalter: 33.4%American Thinker: 22.9%Biased Writer Voice33.6%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 8.0%American Thinker: 5.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.9%American Thinker: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 20.3%American Thinker: 14.5%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Monica Showalter: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

557 words analyzed.

Speakers

3speakers9.3%attributed speech505writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageEunisses Hernandez • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageXavier Becerra • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageXavier Becerra • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageCindy Cobb • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Cindy Cobb

100%flagged-word coverage
9 attributed words17% of attributed speech94% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Cindy Cobb: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-37.0 ptsWriter: 37.0%Cindy Cobb: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-4.0 ptsWriter: 4.0%Cindy Cobb: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.