Author summary
93% 10 analyzed articles/videos 4,230 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Monica Showalter results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Confirmation Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.4% saturation with 9,716 hits . Analysis detected 70,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,086 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 80% (1,241 of 6,171 authors). This Monica Showalter is worse (more manipulative) than 79.90% of the peer group. Monica Showalter
Author details
Total words: 29,086
Article count: 10
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
80% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.9% percentile 4.6% BS Score10 analyzed articles29.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 33.4% 33.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 20.3% 20.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 23.7% 23.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 20.5% 20.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.9% 9.9% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.7% 7.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 33.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 7.1%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 23.7%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 21.1%, sitewide 19.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 20.5%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 20.3%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.3%, sitewide 9.1% Indoctrination: Author 8.0%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Author 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.8%, sitewide 3.1% Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.6% Begging the Question: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst