Daily Kos84%

AOC blames Trump and Musk for ongoing diarrhea disaster 73%

By Oliver Willis92%

7/22/2026, 7:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 24 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 51.5% saturation with 224 hits. Analysis detected 1,435 faulty-reasoning hits from 435 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 64.9% and a BS Rank of 73% (6,041 of 21,886 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 72.40% of the article peer group.

The United States is suffering through a nationwide diarrhea outbreak, and Rep. 
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez told reporters on Tuesday that President Donald Trump and his trillionaire buddy Elon Musk are to blame. 
Cyclospora bacteria causing explosive diarrhea has been introduced to the U.S. food system, and the Food and Drug Administration has been unable to lock down the source and extent of the problem. 
Ocasio-Cortez was asked about the linkage between the cyclosporiasis outbreak and efforts by the Trump administration to cut spending and staffing related to food safety issues. 
“There’s a direct correlation here,” Ocasio-Cortez said. 
“A year ago, you had DOGE ripping through the NIH [National Institutes of Health] and FDA. 
They laid off about a quarter million people, and a lot of these people are responsible for food inspections, drug inspections, our core governmental infrastructure.” 
The Democrat from New York explained that detecting outbreaks like the one currently causing distress for thousands of Americans “is exactly what these people’s jobs were.” 
Related | Well, sh-t: Trump’s gutted FDA can’t find source of diarrhea parasite 
She noted that in the wake of cuts made by Trump and Musk via projects like the Department of Government Efficiency, which were touted for purportedly saving money, “we’re spending even more” to address the problem. 
At least 1,645 cases of cyclosporiasis, which is an illness that causes watery or explosive diarrhea, have been logged by the CDC and more than 5,000 cases are under investigation. 
The agencies faced severe cuts in the months following Trump’s decision to greenlight the DOGE project, which he then appointed Musk—one of his major campaign donors—to run. 
So far, more than 4,200 employees have lost their jobs at the FDA. 
Advocates warned of the danger to food safety early on. 
In a joint statement released in February 2025, a coalition of food and consumer safety groups said that a diminished food safety agency would jeopardize the Trump administration’s claims that they wanted to improve nutrition and ingredient safety for the public. 
“Adequate resources are critical not only for outbreak response but also for developing and updating food safety standards, providing science-based industry guidance, and ensuring a well-trained federal-state inspection force to protect the integrity of our food system,” they said in a statement that has turned out to be prophetic. 
DOGE’s actions ultimately led to a mess, with secure government systems compromised, the gutting of USAID for vulnerable foreign populations who are now dying, and the security of American food compromised. 
The end result: death, diarrhea, and other critical ailments causing pain and suffering. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 51.5%Oliver Willis: 10.7%Daily Kos: 5.7%Confirmation Bias51.5%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.6%Daily Kos: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 18.4%Oliver Willis: 3.4%Daily Kos: 3.3%Availability Heuristic18.4%This article: 6.0%Oliver Willis: 0.8%Daily Kos: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic6.0%This article: 23.0%Oliver Willis: 1.9%Daily Kos: 0.9%Hindsight Bias23.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 1.0%Daily Kos: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 8.0%Oliver Willis: 9.6%Daily Kos: 8.9%Framing Effect8.0%This article: 8.3%Oliver Willis: 0.6%Daily Kos: 0.6%Loss Aversion8.3%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.3%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.3%Daily Kos: 1.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 7.1%Oliver Willis: 1.8%Daily Kos: 2.0%Pessimism Bias7.1%This article: 37.7%Oliver Willis: 19.6%Daily Kos: 15.4%Negativity Bias37.7%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.7%Daily Kos: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 3.6%Daily Kos: 2.6%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 3.3%Daily Kos: 2.1%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 3.2%Daily Kos: 1.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.4%Daily Kos: 1.8%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.6%Daily Kos: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.3%Oliver Willis: 2.3%Daily Kos: 1.5%Recency Bias2.3%This article: 3.7%Oliver Willis: 0.5%Daily Kos: 0.4%Primacy Effect3.7%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 8.4%Daily Kos: 5.8%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 3.4%Daily Kos: 1.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 20.7%Oliver Willis: 1.9%Daily Kos: 3.2%Appeal to Authority20.7%This article: 8.3%Oliver Willis: 3.2%Daily Kos: 2.3%False Dilemma8.3%This article: 7.1%Oliver Willis: 2.5%Daily Kos: 1.3%Slippery Slope7.1%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.7%Oliver Willis: 17.5%Daily Kos: 9.8%Hasty Generalization3.7%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 1.1%Daily Kos: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 10.3%Oliver Willis: 10.3%Daily Kos: 7.3%Appeal to Emotion10.3%This article: 8.0%Oliver Willis: 3.3%Daily Kos: 1.9%Begging the Question8.0%This article: 40.7%Oliver Willis: 6.9%Daily Kos: 3.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)40.7%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 1.0%Daily Kos: 0.5%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 7.4%Oliver Willis: 1.5%Daily Kos: 0.8%Burden of Proof7.4%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.7%Daily Kos: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 2.4%Daily Kos: 2.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.4%Daily Kos: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.9%Oliver Willis: 1.4%Daily Kos: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.9%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.0%Daily Kos: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.3%Daily Kos: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.1%Daily Kos: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 1.5%Daily Kos: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.4%Oliver Willis: 2.7%Daily Kos: 2.8%Unattributed Quote9.4%This article: 1.6%Oliver Willis: 2.2%Daily Kos: 1.8%Quote-first Misdirection1.6%This article: 30.1%Oliver Willis: 35.3%Daily Kos: 23.1%Biased Writer Voice30.1%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 1.9%Daily Kos: 2.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 4.4%Oliver Willis: 23.5%Daily Kos: 10.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Oliver Willis: 0.2%Daily Kos: 0.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Oliver Willis: 1.4%Daily Kos: 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.3%

435 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker30%attributed speech306writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 7 words • 100.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 16 words • 100.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 25 words • 0.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 49 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
129 attributed words100% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%20.0%40.0%Biased Writer Voice-25.2 ptsWriter: 37.6%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 12.4%12.4%Attempt to Sell a Product +27.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 27.9%27.9%Politically Left Leaning B+14.7 ptsWriter: 0.0%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 14.7%14.7%Unattributed Quote-13.4 ptsWriter: 13.4%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+5.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 5.4%5.4%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.