Speaker summary
⁠100%1 analyzed article/video103.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alexandria Ocasio Cortez results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, False Dilemma, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 138 hits. Analysis detected 457.125 faulty-reasoning hits from 103.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (4,953 of 25,762 speakers). This Alexandria Ocasio Cortez is worse (more manipulative) than 80.80% of the peer group.
Alexandria Ocasio Cortez
Speaker details
Total words: 103.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

81% percentile
025507510080.8% percentile
75.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos103.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 100.0%100.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 75.0%75.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Negativity Bias: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 15.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 75.0%, sitewide 1.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 1.9%Negativity BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos