Raw Story⁠93%

Michigan GOP leader's 'extravagant partying' on yachts and jets on campaign dime exposed ⁠79%

By Matthew Chapman⁠85%

7/22/2026, 1:01:49 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Anecdotal, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.8% saturation with 126 hits. Analysis detected 758 faulty-reasoning hits from 275 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 71% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (4,336 of 20,377 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the article peer group.

Former Michigan House Speaker Lee Chatfield was indicted by state prosecutors two years ago on allegations he stole campaign funds and used them for luxuries like a $32,000 Bahamas getaway — and now new details have emerged about the ordeal. 
The Detroit News published new accounts of how Chatfield's former aides spilled the beans in court on the outrageous revelations. 
Former Chatfield Chief of Staff Rob Minard told Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel's prosecutors "that Chatfield used a private jet to travel to a golf resort in South Carolina in November 2020, that he would 'pocket' campaign contributions that came in the form of cash and that he would orchestrate 'extravagant partying,'" said the report. 
His travels "featured trips with lobbyists, the use of a private jet, a yacht rental in Miami, gambling, poolside cabanas and bottle service." 
An attorney who attended Minard's meeting with prosecutors last year said that "Minard told us that Lee Chatfield always had to stay in the most expensive hotels and eat at the most expensive restaurants." 
Minard and his wife Anne have both taken plea deals for filing false tax returns and obtaining money under false pretenses, as part of the investigation. 
Not all the money went to these vacations, noted the report — some just went into Chatfield's bank account. 
"Rob Minard told investigators that Lee Chatfield and his wife, Stephanie, would 'pocket' money from campaign donors that came to their house in the form of cash," noted reporter Craig Mauger. 
Chatfield has pleaded not guilty to the charges against him. 
He faces 13 felonies. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 26.9%Matthew Chapman: 7.5%Rawstory: 7.6%Confirmation Bias26.9%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 1.0%Rawstory: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Matthew Chapman: 3.6%Rawstory: 4.5%Availability Heuristic9.8%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.4%Rawstory: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 1.8%Rawstory: 1.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 1.8%Rawstory: 2.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 24.4%Matthew Chapman: 16.5%Rawstory: 13.7%Framing Effect24.4%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.3%Rawstory: 0.4%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.6%Matthew Chapman: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.4%Status Quo Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.1%Rawstory: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.7%Rawstory: 0.7%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 2.5%Rawstory: 2.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 45.8%Matthew Chapman: 22.3%Rawstory: 22.0%Negativity Bias45.8%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 1.0%Rawstory: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 3.1%Rawstory: 2.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.6%Rawstory: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 2.0%Rawstory: 2.6%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 1.5%Rawstory: 1.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.3%Rawstory: 0.6%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.9%Rawstory: 0.9%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 9.5%Matthew Chapman: 2.0%Rawstory: 1.7%Recency Bias9.5%This article: 7.3%Matthew Chapman: 0.9%Rawstory: 0.7%Primacy Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 6.6%Rawstory: 6.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 1.0%Rawstory: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 29.5%Matthew Chapman: 4.5%Rawstory: 3.8%Appeal to Authority29.5%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 4.1%Rawstory: 2.9%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.6%Rawstory: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.5%Matthew Chapman: 9.9%Rawstory: 12.0%Hasty Generalization14.5%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.4%Rawstory: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.8%Rawstory: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.2%Matthew Chapman: 7.7%Rawstory: 9.2%Appeal to Emotion6.2%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 2.2%Rawstory: 1.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 3.5%Rawstory: 3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 1.1%Rawstory: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 1.3%Rawstory: 1.6%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.3%Rawstory: 0.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 35.3%Matthew Chapman: 4.2%Rawstory: 3.9%Anecdotal35.3%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.3%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 2.8%Rawstory: 2.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.6%Rawstory: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.0%Rawstory: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.2%Rawstory: 0.4%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 43.6%Matthew Chapman: 4.6%Rawstory: 5.5%Unattributed Quote43.6%This article: 14.5%Matthew Chapman: 4.4%Rawstory: 4.2%Quote-first Misdirection14.5%This article: 4.7%Matthew Chapman: 16.0%Rawstory: 15.7%Biased Writer Voice4.7%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 2.0%Rawstory: 3.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 6.2%Rawstory: 8.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 2.6%Rawstory: 1.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Matthew Chapman: 0.6%Rawstory: 0.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

275 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers31%attributed speech189writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageRob Minard • 55 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageCraig Mauger • 31 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Craig Mauger

100%flagged-word coverage
31 attributed words36% of attributed speech100% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+82.0 ptsWriter: 18.0%Craig Mauger: 100.0%100.0%Quote-first Misdirection-21.2 ptsWriter: 21.2%Craig Mauger: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-6.9 ptsWriter: 6.9%Craig Mauger: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.