Author summary
25% 1 analyzed article/video 2,324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kathryn Kranhold — The Examination results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Anecdotal , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 688 hits . Analysis detected 4,842 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,296 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 19% (5,174 of 6,364 authors). This Kathryn Kranhold — The Examination is better (less manipulative) than 81.30% of the peer group. Kathryn Kranhold — The Examination
Author details
Total words: 9,296
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.2% 0.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.4%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 1.4% Burden of Proof: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst