Topic summary
80% 50 analyzed articles/videos 29,689 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Oil Prices results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Post Hoc (False Cause) , and Pessimism Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 11,580 hits . Analysis detected 107,703 faulty-reasoning hits from 130,166 analyzed words across 50 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 10% (14,225 of 15,689 topics). This Oil Prices is better (less manipulative) than 90.70% of the peer group. Oil Prices
Topic details
Total words: 130,166
Article count: 50
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score50 analyzed articles130.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.9% 8.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst