Author summary
66%2 analyzed articles/videos1,452 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Keith Johnson results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Pessimism Bias, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12% saturation with 601 hits. Analysis detected 5,222 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,015 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 54% (2,920 of 6,262 authors). This Keith Johnson is worse (more manipulative) than 53.40% of the peer group.
Keith Johnson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
54%Keith Johnson (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,015
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

53% percentile
025507510053.4% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.7%8.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.0%12.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Author 8.9%8.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 11.5%11.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.8%5.8%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.6%4.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.9%1.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 11.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Pessimism Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.6%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos