AAA national gas price tops $4 amid renewed US strikes on Iran 75%

7/21/2026, 10:08:43 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 19 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 26.7% saturation with 107 hits. Analysis detected 793 faulty-reasoning hits from 401 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 67.6% and a BS Rank of 75% (5,105 of 20,408 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 75.00% of the article peer group.

The AAA national average price for regular gas is back above $4 again amid the U.S. war with the Islamic Republic of Iran. 
As of July 21, the AAA national average for regular fuel is $4.019, up from yesterday's average of $4.003, the week-ago average of $3.859 and the month-ago average of $3.938. 
The year-ago average was much lower at just $3.141. 
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House on Tuesday. 
IRS RAISES BUSINESS MILEAGE DEDUCTION RATE AMID FUEL PRICE SURGE 
"Every time Iran kills an American Soldier they will pay for that killing many times over! 
This directive has been passed on to Secretary of War, Pete Hegseth, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Daniel Caine, and every Leader in the Military," President Donald Trump asserted in a Monday Truth Social post . 
Former Rep. 
Marjorie Taylor Greene, who left Congress early this year after a falling out with the president last year, responded to Trump's comments by writing in a post on X, "Our American soldiers wouldn’t be getting killed if you weren’t fighting an unnecessary war against Iran to open the Strait of Hormuz that was already open before you went to war. 
End the war. 
In your 1st term in 2019, gas was under $2 and inflation was 1.8%, DO THAT AGAIN!" 
ARMY IDS 2 VICTIMS KILLED IN JORDAN AIR BASE ATTACK; TRUMP: IRAN WILL PAY ‘MANY TIMES OVER’ 
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., declared in a Monday post on X, "Gas prices are back above $4 per gallon. 
The Republican war of choice in Iran is making life more expensive. 
Why is Pete Hegseth still around?" 
U.S. 
Central Command (CENTCOM) noted on Monday that it had "completed another round of strikes against Iran at 9 p.m. 
ET, July 20." 
TRUMP WEIGHS IRAN WAR EXPANSION AS FRESH US STRIKES TARGET HORMUZ SHIPPING THREATS 
GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 
"U.S. forces struck Iranian military command centers, maritime capabilities, missile and drone launch sites, and air defense systems to degrade Iran's ability to continue attacking commercial vessels flowing through the Strait of Hormuz. 
Commercial vessel transits through the vital international maritime corridor continue. 
Since early May, CENTCOM forces have helped facilitate the transit of approximately 900 commercial vessels and 450 million barrels of crude oil," the release noted . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 23.2%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Confirmation Bias23.2%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 3.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 10.7%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Availability Heuristic10.7%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 0.7%Hindsight Bias4.2%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 3.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 21.7%FoxBusiness: 13.0%Framing Effect21.7%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.1%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%FoxBusiness: 8.9%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 2.0%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 15.5%FoxBusiness: 7.8%Negativity Bias15.5%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.7%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 15.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias15.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 3.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 7.5%FoxBusiness: 2.3%Recency Bias7.5%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 1.5%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Ad Hominem1.5%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 24.2%FoxBusiness: 7.2%Appeal to Authority24.2%This article: 7.2%FoxBusiness: 1.6%False Dilemma7.2%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.2%FoxBusiness: 6.3%Hasty Generalization4.2%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.8%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 8.2%FoxBusiness: 6.1%Appeal to Emotion8.2%This article: 15.0%FoxBusiness: 1.2%Begging the Question15.0%This article: 26.7%FoxBusiness: 4.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)26.7%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 2.4%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 1.8%Unattributed Quote0.7%This article: 4.0%FoxBusiness: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection4.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.7%FoxBusiness: 1.7%Indoctrination0.7%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 0.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%FoxBusiness: 2.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 5.0%FoxBusiness: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…5.0%

401 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers58%attributed speech169writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageFox News Digital • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 16 words • 100.0% coveragePresident Donald Trump • 38 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageMarjorie Taylor Greene • 60 words • 0.0% coverageMarjorie Taylor Greene • 3 words • 100.0% coverageMarjorie Taylor Greene • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 21 words • 0.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 12 words • 0.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 100.0% coverageCentral Command (CENTCOM) • 19 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command (CENTCOM) • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageCentral Command (CENTCOM) • 26 words • 0.0% coverage
100%flagged-word coverage
80 attributed words34% of attributed speech82% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.3 ptsWriter: 5.3%Marjorie Taylor Greene: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination+3.8 ptsWriter: 0.0%Marjorie Taylor Greene: 3.8%3.8%Unattributed Quote-1.8 ptsWriter: 1.8%Marjorie Taylor Greene: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.