Topic summary
90% 19 analyzed articles/videos 12,213 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Iran Conflict results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 5,754 hits . Analysis detected 56,105 faulty-reasoning hits from 49,484 analyzed words across 19 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (11,265 of 15,447 topics). This Iran Conflict is better (less manipulative) than 72.90% of the peer group. Iran Conflict
Topic details
Total words: 49,484
Article count: 19
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.1% percentile 2.1% BS Score19 analyzed articles49.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst