Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video339 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Timothy Gardner results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Optimism Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 171 hits. Analysis detected 915 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,356 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 75% (1,680 of 6,629 authors). This Timothy Gardner is worse (more manipulative) than 74.70% of the peer group.
Timothy Gardner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
75%Timothy Gardner (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,356
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

75% percentile
025507510074.7% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.8%3.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.6%12.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.4%2.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.1%1.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 5.2%5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 5.3%5.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 12.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 10.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 4.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Begging the Question: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos