Author summary
ā 5%1 analyzed article/video309 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Wilder results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 103 hits. Analysis detected 176 faulty-reasoning hits from 927 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ā 82% (1,183 of 6,409 authors). This Anna Wilder is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
Anna Wilder
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
ā 0%Vivek Chibber1%
ā 0%Sneha Dey1%
ā 0%Ideastream Public Media1%
ā 0%Megan Fan Munce1%
ā 1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
ā 82%Anna Wilder (selected)5%
ā 100%Greg Rosenstein38%
ā 100%Siham Shamalakh43%
ā 100%Greg Miller54%
ā 100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
ā 100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 927
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510081.6% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles927 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0ā€“50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.7%2.7%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos