Author summary
25%1 analyzed article/video379 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Pamela Osborne results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 134 hits. Analysis detected 603 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,137 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of 82% (1,143 of 6,204 authors). This Pamela Osborne is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group.
Pamela Osborne
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
82%Pamela Osborne (selected)5%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,137
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510081.6% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.8%11.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 7.0%7.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.9%5.9%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Author 4.8%4.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 3.8%3.8%Actor-Observer BiasSitewide 0.6%Author 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.6%7.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.2%1.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.6%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 7.0%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.1%Burden of Proof: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.4%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 4.3%, sitewide 0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos