Author summary
â 75% 1 analyzed article/video 375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jacob Nagel results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Optimism Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 16.3% saturation with 183 hits . Analysis detected 949 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,125 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of â 77% (1,456 of 6,263 authors). This Jacob Nagel is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Jacob Nagel
Author details
Total words: 1,125
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 76.8% percentile 4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 16.3% 16.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.9% 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product⌠Sitewide 0.5% Author 5.3% 5.3% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.7% 3.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Halo Effect: Author 16.3%, sitewide 6.7% Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.5%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 6.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.8%, sitewide 5.3% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 5.3%, sitewide 0.5% Anecdotal: Author 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 3.7%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Personal Incredulity: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst