Author summary
⁠69%1 analyzed article/video649 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Angel Delich results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 19.5% saturation with 380 hits. Analysis detected 2,152 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,947 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (1,159 of 6,348 authors). This Angel Delich is worse (more manipulative) than 81.80% of the peer group.
Angel Delich
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠82%Angel Delich (selected)5%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,947
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

82% percentile
025507510081.8% percentile
4.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 19.5%19.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.5%2.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.4%11.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.3%4.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 3.3%3.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 10.7%10.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 19.5%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 11.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 10.7%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.0%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos