Chicago songwriter Ktwheels refreshes classic alt-rock 23%

By Jamie Ludwig0%

7/20/2026, 2:00:00 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 11 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.3% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 406 faulty-reasoning hits from 277 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.5% and a BS Rank of 23% (16,311 of 21,194 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the article peer group.

Katie Wheeler breathes fresh air into familiar rock styles. 
The California-raised singer and guitarist played in bands as a student at Indiana University before moving to Chicago in 2023. 
Since then, she’s gotten involved in several local projects, most notably singing and playing guitar in indie-rock outfit Junior Miss (who announced a hiatus in June). 
In 2024, Wheeler launched her solo vehicle Ktwheels (usually styled “ktwheels”), and last year she dropped her debut EP, Junk Drawer, where she’s backed by guitarist Alvin John Santner, drummer Tommy Sagins, bassist Aval Stanley Zaucha, and multi-instrumentalist Max DiFrisco (who also produced the EP). 
The record’s five songs merge straightforward 1990s alt-rock and poppy early-2000s emo, sometimes adding hints of introspective indie folk. 
The laid-back, twangy “Slate, Clean” would sound just as good on the soundtrack of a coming-of-age flick as it would though the PA system in a dive bar, and “Midwestern Deprestern” enhances its forlorn mood with mandolin, double bass, and viola. 
Wheeler’s latest single, the March release “Does She Know,” pairs melancholy guitar à la Smashing Pumpkins with lyrics about a broken relationship that hasn’t quite ended, even though her partner is already seeing someone else. 
(Girl, run!) 
But in true 90s alt-rock fashion, Wheeler follows the heart-on-sleeve confessions with a swift hit of guitar rage—it sounds like she’ll bounce back strong and never play second fiddle again. 
At this Cole’s show, Wheeler will be joined by the same trio that accompanied her on a short east-coast tour this spring—Santner, Sagins, and bassist Matt McCarthy. 
Ktwheels Sun Queen and Tiffy open. 
Fri 8/7, 9 PM, Cole’s Bar, 2338 N. 
Milwaukee, $16, 21+ 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 2.0%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.3%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 14.8%Jamie Ludwig: 4.9%Chicago Reader: 2.1%Availability Heuristic14.8%This article: 6.9%Jamie Ludwig: 5.9%Chicago Reader: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic6.9%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 1.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Jamie Ludwig: 1.1%Chicago Reader: 3.0%Framing Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.4%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 10.8%Jamie Ludwig: 10.8%Chicago Reader: 2.9%Optimism Bias10.8%This article: 12.6%Jamie Ludwig: 4.2%Chicago Reader: 0.9%Pessimism Bias12.6%This article: 25.6%Jamie Ludwig: 8.5%Chicago Reader: 4.2%Negativity Bias25.6%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 1.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Jamie Ludwig: 6.7%Chicago Reader: 6.6%Halo Effect5.4%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 1.0%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 4.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.1%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.3%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 13.4%Jamie Ludwig: 4.7%Chicago Reader: 3.0%Appeal to Emotion13.4%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 14.8%Jamie Ludwig: 4.9%Chicago Reader: 2.2%Anecdotal14.8%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.2%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.7%Jamie Ludwig: 0.2%Chicago Reader: 0.7%Unattributed Quote0.7%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 38.3%Jamie Ludwig: 23.6%Chicago Reader: 10.6%Biased Writer Voice38.3%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.2%Chicago Reader: 1.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jamie Ludwig: 0.0%Chicago Reader: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

277 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker45%attributed speech151writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageKatie Wheeler • 20 words • 0.0% coverageKatie Wheeler • 26 words • 0.0% coverageKatie Wheeler • 45 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 100.0% coverageKatie Wheeler • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Katie Wheeler

28%flagged-word coverage
126 attributed words100% of attributed speech71% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Biased Writer Voice-19.2 ptsWriter: 47.0%Katie Wheeler: 27.8%27.8%Unattributed Quote-1.3 ptsWriter: 1.3%Katie Wheeler: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.