Speaker summary
⁠97%1 analyzed article/video73.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Creed results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Appeal to Emotion, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 49 hits. Analysis detected 245 faulty-reasoning hits from 73.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 60% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (7,019 of 28,364 speakers). This Creed is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group.
Creed
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 73.5
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

75% percentile
025507510075.3% percentile
60.0% BS Score1 analyzed videos73.5 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Framing Effect: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 26.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 0.8%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 7.5%Loss Aversion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos