Author summary
10% 5 analyzed articles/videos 1,253 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emily Zemler results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 641 hits . Analysis detected 5,504 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,447 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 12% (5,598 of 6,362 authors). This Emily Zemler is better (less manipulative) than 88.00% of the peer group. Emily Zemler
Author details
Total words: 9,447
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 12.0% percentile 1.5% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst